Why it mattersOur approachMethodologyAI EngineCapabilitiesProductPricingFAQLoginSign up
AI web application pentesting · Evidence-led and governed

Beyond Scanning.
Towards Smarter Security Testing.

AI-powered web application penetration testing informed by real-world security expertise.

The AI Pentest Agent coordinates specialised testing agents, deterministic security tools and evidence-led analysis - so application behaviour is examined with the reasoning of a tester and the repeatability of engineered tooling.

Authorised scope onlyEvidence-led findingsApproval gates for higher-risk actions
AI reasoning + deterministic tools
Finding verified against evidence
Faster · On-demand · A few clicks

Deeper testing, in less time

Start an assessment whenever you need one, follow it live on a visual dashboard, and get an actionable report - without waiting on a long engagement cycle.

OWASP Top 10
Mapped across the testing scope
~70%*
Faster turnaround vs. traditional cycles
24 / 7
On-demand - start in a few clicks
Near-zero*
False positives - findings evidence-verified
Context-aware
Business-logic and chained weaknesses
Deeper*
Coverage than scanning alone
1
Add your target
Enter the app URL and scope
2
Run the assessment
On-demand, one click to start
3
Get your report
Evidence-led, ready to act on

* Figures marked with an asterisk are illustrative targets that describe the intended value of the platform. They are pending internal validation and are not measured performance or guarantees. See the product team for confirmed metrics.

Built on responsible-testing principlesAuthorised scopeEvidence integrityFinding verification[ accreditation and certification logos - configure ]
Where conventional testing falls short

Three ways to test - one you can trust

Conventional testing and generic AI tools each solve part of the problem. Our approach keeps the speed of AI, with the control, evidence and oversight security teams need.

Conventional testing

Valuable, but limited for today's risks.
  • Strong human insightDeep expertise and context
  • Point-in-time coverageLimited by time and resources
  • Manual follow-upFindings require manual validation and tracking

Generic AI testing

Fast, but often leaves questions.
  • Fast automationQuick results at scale
  • Can be opaqueLimited visibility into how results are generated
  • Control questions remainGovernance, accuracy, and context may be unclear
Our approach

CyRAACS approach

AI-powered testing you can trust.
  • Governed executionPolicy-driven, authorized, and controllable
  • Evidence-led findingsClear, detailed, and traceable results
  • Reviewable outputsHuman oversight at every stage

The real differentiator is not AI alone.
It is capability with control.

BUILT FOR AUTHORIZED WEB APPLICATION SECURITY TESTING.

Our approach

What makes our AI worth trusting

Anyone can put “AI” on a scanner. What matters is how the AI is guided, kept in check and backed by evidence - so testing works like a real method, not a model guessing. Hover over or select a point to see it in action.

Methodology

Six simple stages

From setting the scope to a report you can act on - each stage builds on the one before it.

1

Define scope

Set the authorised target, boundaries and exclusions before any testing begins.

2

Discover

Map the application surface, routes and inputs - including authenticated areas where provided.

3

Analyse

Examine how the application behaves and reason about where meaningful weaknesses may exist.

4

Test

Run targeted, controlled checks using deterministic tooling, with approval gates on higher-risk actions.

5

Review evidence

Correlate captured evidence and run configured verification workflows before a finding is confirmed.

6

Report

Produce a structured assessment with severity, evidence and remediation guidance.

Actual assessment coverage depends on target accessibility, authentication, scope, configuration and enabled capabilities. Coverage is reported transparently rather than assumed.

Inside the AI engine

How the AI engine works together

Not one big model - a team of parts that each do one job well. Tap any part to see what it does. A coordinator runs the show, and evidence and review happen right alongside testing.

Capabilities

Grouped by testing stage and outcome

What each group does, and why it matters for a credible assessment. Specific capabilities are subject to product-team confirmation and may vary by release and plan.

Initial release scope: web application security testing only. Network, cloud, infrastructure and mobile application testing are not part of the initial offering.

Illustrative product experience

See how an assessment comes together

A walkthrough of coordinated panels. Every number, route and finding below is illustrative sample data - not live platform output or measured performance.

app.cyraacs.com / overviewBanking Application Dashboard
38
Routes discovered
72%
Route coverage
14
Findings raised
9
Evidence-backed
Findings by severity (illustrative)
CRIT2Broken access control chain
HIGH4Authorisation and injection
MED5Input handling and config
Assessment status
Discoverycomplete
Active testingin progress
Evidence reviewqueued

Illustrative map of discovered routes and their testing state.

/login
testedauth
/api/v2/orders/{id}
testedfinding
/account/profile
testedauth
/search
testedfinding
/api/v2/users
testingauth
/admin/reports
queuedrole
/checkout
testedflow
/password/reset
testedauth
Reconnaissance and discovery
38 routes mapped · 3 roles identified
done
Parsing and enumeration
Parameters and state analysed
done
Active security testing
Controlled checks · higher-risk actions gated
Evidence review and validation
Verification workflows pending
queued
Structured reporting
Generated after review
queued
HIGH
Broken object-level authorisation
GET /api/v2/orders/{id}
Weakness classAccess control
Affected roleviewer
Evidencecaptured
Verificationworkflow passed
Severity basisimpact × exposure
Captured evidence
# request as role: viewerGET /api/v2/orders/1042Authorization: Bearer ••••# response200 OK - record owned by another user# owner id ≠ session id✓ evidence stored · finding chained

Illustrative evidence only. Redaction and handling follow evidence-integrity controls.

Web Application Assessment

app.cyraacs.com · BANKING APPLICATION DASHBOARD
2Critical
4High
5Medium
3Low
Broken access control chainCRIT
Authorisation bypass · orders APIHIGH
Reflected input in error templateMED
Verbose error disclosureMED
A structured technical assessment. It is not a formal certification or compliance attestation. Each finding links to its supporting evidence and remediation guidance.
Trust, governance and safety

Capability without control is a liability

Responsible security testing needs both technical depth and controlled execution. These principles are built into how the platform is designed to operate. Hover over or select a control to see how it works.

FAQ

Straight answers

Clear, accurate answers that reflect confirmed product scope and intent.

It is a platform that coordinates web application security testing using AI reasoning together with specialised testing agents and deterministic security tools. It analyses application behaviour, assesses potential vulnerabilities, captures evidence and organises findings into a structured assessment report - within an authorised scope.
A conventional scanner typically runs a fixed set of predefined checks. The AI Pentest Agent coordinates testing activities and reasons about how a specific application behaves - including multi-step workflows - while using deterministic tooling to carry out and observe tests. Findings are supported by captured evidence rather than a label alone. It is designed to complement, not replace, existing tools and human testers.
The initial release focuses exclusively on web application security testing. Actual coverage depends on target accessibility, authentication, scope, configuration and enabled capabilities. Network, cloud, infrastructure and mobile application testing are not part of the initial offering.
Authenticated testing is supported where credentials and configuration are provided, subject to product-team confirmation of the specifics for each plan. Authenticated areas are mapped and tested within the authorised scope. [ Confirm supported authentication methods before publishing. ]
API testing may be available where supported in the initial release. Because this depends on the confirmed feature set, please treat API coverage as subject to product-team confirmation rather than guaranteed. [ Confirm API testing scope and supported API types before publishing. ]
Findings are supported by captured evidence and can pass through configured verification workflows before being reported. This is designed to improve the credibility of findings. We do not claim that every finding is independently verified - the applicable validation steps depend on the finding type and configuration.
No. It is designed to make application security testing more structured, consistent and evidence-led, and to work alongside human expertise - not to remove the judgement an experienced penetration tester brings to complex, context-specific assessments.
It is a structured technical assessment of the tested web application within the defined scope: findings, severity, supporting evidence and remediation guidance. It reflects what was tested and observed during the assessment, given the coverage achieved.
No. The report is a technical security assessment. It is not a formal certification, accreditation or compliance attestation. It can support your broader security and compliance activities, but it does not by itself certify compliance with any standard.
Three tiers are planned - Free, Standard and Advanced - scaled to increasing assessment needs and capability depth. Pricing, quotas and specific entitlements are being finalised; see the Plans section, where placeholders mark what the product team will confirm.
Use any “Sign up” button on this page, or the form below. These actions are configurable - the marketing team can connect them to the live CRM, scheduling or form endpoint before launch.
Ready when you are

Make Your Next Security Assessment More Actionable.

See how coordinated testing agents, deterministic tooling and evidence-led analysis come together on your own web application - within an authorised scope.

Sign up

Tell us about the web application you'd like assessed. A member of the team will follow up to arrange a walkthrough.

By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request. We only use the details you provide to respond. Privacy policy [ configure ]